Kettle

Press: Radio, Print & Reviews


index


Article

Author: luther blissett Date: 10/25/2001

"Creative Use of Technology in Music: Kettle"

Creative Use of Technology in Music

Technology is everywhere. Technology is used everyday by billions of people around the globe often in the same way. Surely the computer revolution should allow us to focus less on the practical and more on the creative, yet it is blindingly obvious that access to technology does not automatically provide for innovation and quality. Just look at the top ten in your country and I`m pretty sure you`ll agree. So many little cooks with the same recipes. In a big sea, the little fish get swallowed by one or two giant whales and that is all the ignorant really see. The true jewels often lie hidden at the bottom, where only the intrepid will find them. In this series we look at independent musicians who use technology creatively.

Part Two : Kettle

For the last few years it has been impossible to talk about experimental music with out mentioning Andrew Kettle. From hosting Atmospheric Disturbances, a weekly sound-art show on 4ZZZ, to moderating the Aus Noise E-group; curating the monthly Small Black Box sound art evenings to conducting beautiful symphonies of electro-magnetic feedback. He has received national and international acclaim for his "Lotto" release: a 3"cd with 45 short pieces for Random play and an actual Lotto grid for playing along. Highly opinionated, philosophically motivated, influenced by principles of Alchemy: Andrew Kettle is a true original in the field of Electronic music. Here is what he had to say about the creative use of technology in music.

n.Crypt : Do you feel the personal computer evolution has enhanced your creative abilities?

Kettle: In different ways... it has allowed the fullfillment of technological visions of instrument and performance interfaces that I have had for quite a while. It has also allowed for a simplicity of design overlayed bycomplex calculations that I don`t have to get too involved in. Take Sonic Foundry`s Acid program for example: it is a very simple program , yet it actually does a lot of complex things. In another way, the PC has truly awakened a new collaboration and networking of creative artists...
email, search engines, newsgroups, resources, streaming; the list goes on of new approaches to communication....

n.Crypt : How do you create your art?

Kettle : The majority of my creativity sources from a simple fascination with the natural world, its processes and mechanisms; studying biological rhythms and design is beyond fascination; the awe of science, physics and chemistry is inspiring. Any development of a work has a tremendous number of external influences... a beautiful system is the astrological harmonies or
the elementary table or the micro/macrocosm of a factory.

n.Crypt : So you are driven by very philosophical concepts - how does this translate to the technology? Do you merely use it as a tool for exploiting your vision, or does the process of creation meet your philosophical concerns midway?

Kettle : I tend to conceive and employ the tools and intruments as devices and keys to enter or build another perspective.... The best technologies are the tools that create alternative realities for comparison to our present ones...beyond this if a relationship that develops whereby the user and the interface are indistinguishable then it would be a higher design that
complements both participants...

n.Crypt : What is the motivation for what you do?

Kettle : For taxation purposes, the answer must be: to ultimately establish a profitable work practice and lifestyle.... be this as a combination of the label, my composition, performance, writing and lecturing. It`s an encouraging thought that I get opportunities from gallery installation to lecturing.

n.Crypt : To what extent are you restricted (by technology or other factors)?

Kettle : Generally, financial restrictions is the hardest ... yet, approaching works as adaptive is beneficial.

n.Crypt : So is it what you`ve got or what you do with what you`ve got?

Kettle : It goes without saying that it is a point in the present that concerns me most, as a result that which surrounds me is utilised to it`s best ability. Yet, I know there are more beneficial modes of operating that would make things more fluid... still the journey to a point is ....[?]

n.Crypt : In what sectors of the community do you feel you are most appreciated.

Kettle : Anybody with a sense of adventure; an appreciation or awareness of their limitations, that acknowledge the reality of comparison in judgement; anybody that shares the sense of wonder about the world around us, yet has an enthusiastic grasp on imaginated landscapes; anybody that considers other levels of perception and symbolism, or a comprehension of the microcosmic and macrocosmic structure of the world that we live in.

n.Crypt : Is there a particular demographic?

Kettle : No, not to my knowledge..... it`s more the perception.

n.Crypt : What do you hope to achieve, what do you want the audience to achieve?

Kettle : An acknowledgement of the pure wonder of the world that we live in, for an audience, the removal of any limitations of perception; to an extent the questioning of `identity`, the comparison of experience; to
question `what` we believe and where we received those belief structures from; to be honest.

n.Crypt : What other issues are incorporated in your art and how do you "technologize" these issues?

Kettle : Recent works have considered environmental awareness of our living conditions and our exposure to the unnatural world that we have created; through making people aware of native radiation in their life...

n.Crypt : What is your favourite mode of operation (creatively!)

Kettle : Quiet mediation that affords me a greater perspective of approaching and creating works; an objective complete over-view of a work is greatly appreciated during development of a project; studying a subject enough to then explore the field by experience. I enjoy `collaborative` opportunities to work on a project that it divided and each participant completing the jigsaw.

n.Crypt : Who do you admire and why?

Kettle : I`m constantly in a state of awe for local resident wild-life... their resiliance, adaptability... everything from birds to marsupials... to think that their blood line extends past colonization.

n.Crypt : How do you incorporate this admiration in your work?

Kettle : Not directly, as in `sampling` noises` except for an early piece which used insects... it`s more of a consideration and influence...

n.Crypt : What is coming up in the future for you?

Kettle : Establishing a plan to position myself in a regular circuit of works, from festivals to residencies... to develop the regionalism of artists and audiences...

n.Crypt : What is the hardest thing you have had to deal with?

Kettle : Realising that there is a ceiling to sound art in Australia, and the inevitable travel to professionally develop.

n.Crypt : Please explain, ceiling?

Kettle : Oh, it`s that feeling that you know everyone and every festival and every radio show that utilises experiemental music or sound art... and the limit that you can have your work supported by these outlets.

n.Crypt : What has been you most rewarding work?

Kettle : Organising performance events that allow emerging artists or future collaborations to develop.

n.Crypt : Any particular occasions/gigs?

Kettle : "Audio Pollen", "Small Black Box", "What is Music? in Brisbane", "Atmospheric Disturbances".

n.Crypt : You seem to have very keen environmental awareness; does this conflict with your use of technology?

Kettle : Completely, an environmental conflict has followed me throughout my creative expression, from photograph to landscape sculptures, sound production appears to use the least amount of resources.

n.Crypt : Can you see your interface with technology as diminishing or expanding in the future?

Kettle : Completely expanding.. sound has a long way to go to be...[?]

n.Crypt : Where do you see the future of sound-art in particular?

Kettle : Building better speakers.... current speaker design is highly ineffeciant.... coupling health awareness of hearing with art...

n.Crypt : You worked as a hearing aid specialist for a time, how does this inform your performance (especially considering "sound-art" is often described as "noise" excessive amounts of which are accused of causing hearing difficulties)?

Kettle : My experience in the hearing aid industry was somewhat soul bruising! The term `hearing aid` is somewhat deceptive in that most hearing aids just amplify the range of frequencies that we `talk` in, so that human communication is not lost; this is not at all `hearing` by my definition. It made me aware of the reality of hearing loss and damage. I tend not to think of `sound-art` as being heard but would presume that it is `listened` to.... still it relies on the health of our ears.

n.Crypt : Explain some of the inefficiancies in speaker design, and how one might remedy the situation.

Kettle : As for speaker design, most of the speaker drivers are highly inefficient, in that a lot of the electricity is transformed into heat and not sound which is the desired outcome. Speakers could go a long way in being designed to reduce this loss. There are some designs I have seen from the experiement labs of `metal` sheets that vibrate when voltage is applied but it`s ultrasound that is produced. The latest craze of ultrasound distortion producing sound in air is interesting though.... the efficiency seems to be way up there, but to prototype prices you way out of the market.

Kettle website.